Saturday, October 22, 2016

Coming Ice Age?, More Rumors Of War

‘Sun’s Heartbeat’ Indicates Soon-coming ICE AGE

With 97% accuracy, a Russian scientist is able to predict the earth is entering into an ICE AGE.
Solar cycles have been known in the scientific community for quite a while, but recently Valentina Zharkova from Northumbria University studied dynamo effects in two layers of the sun and concluded that the magnetic activity would decline by 60% sometime after 2020 and before 2050.
The last time this happened was between 1645 to 1715 in what is known as the Maunder Munimum, but is more commonly referred to as the Little Ice Age (the one before Hillary Clinton chillingly came into power).
The Bible referred to a time “When the morning stars sang together,” suggesting the idea that stars are almost alive, which corroborates with what Mr. Zharkova said when he described  “The Sun’s ’11-year heartbeat’ – the period it takes for magnetic activity to fluctuate,” according to a Express.Co.Uk article.
Other people are noticing some oddities about the sun, most notably how its sunspots have disappeared. Apparently, a sun can change its spots, unlike a leopard.
The fact that the sunspots have vanished is leading some in the scientific community to believe that we are about to enter into an ice age.
One such empirical watchman is Paul Dorian, who issued this dire warning: "The blank sun is a sign that the next solar minimum is approaching and there will be an increasing number of spotless days over the next few years.”
Mr. Dorian continued, "At first, the blankness will stretch for just a few days at a time, then it'll continue for weeks at a time, and finally it should last for months at a time when the sunspot cycle reaches its nadir. The next solar minimum phase is expected to take place around 2019 or 2020."

As polls show Hillary Clinton closing in on victory, Official Washington’s neoconservative (and liberal-hawk) foreign policy establishment is rubbing its hands in anticipation of more war and more strife, including a U.S. military escalation in Syria, a take-down of Iran, and a showdown with nuclear-armed Russia.

What is perhaps most alarming about this new “group think” is that there doesn’t appear to be any significant resistance to the expectation that President Hillary Clinton will unleash these neocon/liberal-hawk forces of intervention that President Barack Obama has somewhat restrained.
Assuming Donald Trump’s defeat – increasingly seen as a foregone conclusion – the Republican leadership would mostly be in sync with Clinton if she adopts a hawkish foreign policy similar to what was pursued by President George W. Bush. Meanwhile, most Democrats would be hesitant to challenge their party’s new president.
The propaganda campaign is driven by a consensus among the major think tanks of Official Washington, where there is near universal support for Hillary Clinton, not because they all particularly like her, but because she has signaled a return to neocon/liberal-hawk strategies.

As Greg Jaffe wrote for the neocon-dominated Washington Post on Friday, “In the rarefied world of the Washington foreign policy establishment, President Obama’s departure from the White House — and the possible return of a more conventional and hawkish Hillary Clinton — is being met with quiet relief.
“The Republicans and Democrats who make up the foreign policy elite are laying the groundwork for a more assertive American foreign policy, via a flurry of reports shaped by officials who are likely to play senior roles in a potential Clinton White House.
One of the lead organizations revving up these military adventures and also counting on a big boost in military spending under President Clinton-45 is the Atlantic Council, a think tank associated with NATO that has been pushing for a major confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia.
The plans call for “safe zones” where Syrian rebels can base themselves behind U.S. military protection, allowing them to strike Syrian government forces but preventing the Syrian government from striking back. Little attention is paid to the fact that the so-called “moderate” rebels have refused to separate themselves from Al Qaeda’s forces who are in command of the rebel movement in east Aleppo and other urban areas.

As journalist/historian Gareth Porter has written: “Information from a wide range of sources, including some of those the United States has been explicitly supporting, makes it clear that every armed anti-Assad organization unit in those provinces [of Idlib and Aleppo] is engaged in a military structure controlled by [Al Qaeda’s] Nusra militants. All of these rebel groups fight alongside the Nusra Front and coordinate their military activities with it. …

“At least since 2014 the Obama administration has armed a number of Syrian rebel groups even though it knew the groups were coordinating closely with the Nusra Front, which was simultaneously getting arms from Turkey and Qatar.”

ut it is not just the Republican neocons and old Democratic hawks who are determined to whip the American people into line behind more war. As Jaffe wrote, “A similar sentiment animates the left-leaning Center for American Progress’s report, which calls for more military action to counter Iranian aggression, more dialogue with the United States’ Arab allies and more support for economic and human rights reform in the region.”

These “liberal hawks” are enthused that now almost the entire foreign policy elite of Official Washington is singing from the same sheet of martial music. There is none of the discord that surrounded Bush’s war in Iraq last decade.
As Brian Katulis, a senior Middle East analyst at the Center for American Progress, said, “The dynamic is totally different from what I saw a decade ago.” He added that the current focus from all sides is on rebuilding a more muscular and more “centrist internationalism.”
In other words, the Iraq War “group think” that enveloped Official Washington before that catastrophe wasn’t total enough. Now, there is almost a totalitarian feel about the way the foreign policy elites, coordinating with the major U.S. news media, are marching the American people toward possibly even worse disasters.
No serious dissent is allowed; no contrarian thoughts expressed; no thinking through where the schemes might end up – unless you want to be marginalized as an Assad “apologist” or a Putin “puppet.” And right now, there doesn’t seem to be any practical way to stop this new march of folly.

Approaching The Tribulation: We Are Seeing Exactly What We Would Expect: Lies, Distortion, Collapse, Rumors Of War, Totalitarianism, etc...

As stated many times before - we should have never expected that the Tribulation would begin as if a light switch was turned on. In other words, we should have never expected that life would be completely "normal" as the Tribulation approaches and then suddenly the antichrist comes to power and things on earth change immediately overnight without any warnings or gradual approach into that world. 

No. Rather, we should expect to see a continual approach to the Tribulation where the stage is set well in advance of the antichrist and his rise to power. That is exactly what we are seeing now. 

Things have become so strange, bizarre and surreal that it is impossible to miss, unless you are so deluded and consumed by the MSM and their lies and distortions that you have become blind to the reality of life on planet earth in 2016. 

Just one day of headlines tells the story, but remember the most important thought at this point:

Ephesians 6:12

12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.

Massive Cyber Hack In The U.S., Theft Of Power Coming

Twitter, Spotify and Reddit are among major sites taken OFFLINE in massive shock cyber attack

A massive co-ordinated series of cyber attacks has forced hundreds of major websites from Amazon to Twitter offline across the globe - and WikiLeaks believes its supporters were responsible.
It urged its backers to 'stop taking down the US internet', saying 'Mr Assange is still alive and WikiLeaks is still publishing'.
It then tweeted: 'The Obama administration should not have attempted to misuse its instruments of state to stop criticism of its ruling party candidate.' 
The Ecuadorian government switched off Assange's internet service in its UK embassy Sunday after he released another tranche of emails showing the contents of a speech given by Hillary Clinton to Goldman Sachs. 
WikiLeaks accused John Kerry and the US Government of asking Ecuador to shut down Assange's internet connection, but the South American country denied it came under any pressure from the US or any other government.
The Department of Homeland Security has already launched an urgent investigation into the Friday's crash, amid claims it could be a precursor to an attempt to disrupt the US Presidential election further.  
The White House called the disruption malicious and a hacker group claimed responsibility, though its assertion couldn't be verified. 
Internet service company Dyn, which controls the 'address book' of the internet for dozens of major companies, said that it had suffered its first denial of service (DDoS) attack shortly after 6AM ET (11AM BST), in an attack that mostly affected the east coast of the US. 
It told CNBC the attack is 'well planned and executed, coming from tens of millions of IP addresses at same time.'
Despite WikiLeaks' claims its supporters were behind the attacks, members of a shadowy collective that calls itself New World Hackers claimed responsibility for the attack via Twitter.
They said they organized networks of connected 'zombie' computers called botnets that threw a staggering 1.2 terabits per second of data at the Dyn-managed servers.
'We didn't do this to attract federal agents, only test power,' two collective members who identified themselves as 'Prophet' and 'Zain' told an AP reporter via Twitter direct message exchange. 
Dyn first became aware of an attack Friday morning, focused on data centers on the East Coast of the U.S. Services were restored about two hours later. But then attackers shifted to offshore data centers, and problems continue. 
The second attack broadened its net, affecting the U.S. West Coast. 'Prophet' of New World Hackers said hacktivists of the broad, more amorphous Anonymous collective piled on in the third wave on Friday afternoon.

 In a little over two weeks, we're going to find out whether we have a country anymore. If Hillary Clinton seizes the White House, she will preside over an illegitimate, illegal dictatorship that was seized through massive fraud, collusion and corruption at every level.

Without all the fraud, collusion and corruption, Hillary Clinton would have been indicted for criminal violations of national security. She would be down 20 points in the polls, and the media wouldn't be covering up all her crimes and failures. Without the collusion, Hillary Clinton wouldn't have known all the TV debate questions ahead of time. The voter "panels" wouldn't have been coached by Clinton operatives to regurgitate rehearsed comments, and the official media polls wouldn't have been rigged to construct the appearance of widespread Clinton support.

Every element of this election is so rigged, so illegal and so fraudulent that if Hillary Clinton "wins" this vote, the Presidency of the United States will be null and void.

As Wikileaks accurately states in this tweet, "There is no US election. There is power consolidation. Rigged primary, rigged media and rigged 'pied piper' candidate drive consolidation."

There is no US election. There is power consolidation. Rigged primary, rigged media and rigged 'pied piper' candidate drive consolidation.

"Sadly, it is difficult to disagree with the assessment," adds Zero Hedge. "That an establishment democratic candidate could endure an extended FBI investigation, in which multiple federal laws were clearly and intentionally broken, and clear evidence of corruption and collusion between the FBI and State Department is mind boggling. Throw in evidence from WikiLeaks clearly linking the DNC to criminal efforts to incite violence at rallies, numerous examples of pay-to-play activities at the Clinton Foundation, blatant media collusion, etc, etc, and it actually becomes quite frightening."

All this explains why Donald Trump should openly and firmly reject the results of a fraudulent election. It is not anti-democratic to do so, by the way, when your opponent despises democracy and has rigged the entire election from the start to obliterate democratic principles.

What's clear right now is that democrats hate democracy. They despise a free and fair election because they don't trust the voters to elect democrats unless massive fraud is involved. This demonstrates, by the way, just how much the democrats know their own leaders are hated by the voters. (It's also why democrats can never run for office by telling the truth of what they plan to do. Case in point: Hillary's ridiculous claim that she "will not add a penny" to the national debt.)

As Selwyn Duke writes in The New American, "No, Trump Should Not Accept the Results of a Possibly Stolen Election."

Reality No. 1: There is vote fraud.

Reality No. 2: Since there's vote fraud, it's possible an election -- especially a close one -- could be stolen.